Friday, March 20, 2009

Did Mark-to-Market Create a Phony Banking Crisis?

Last spring, the banks and the Feds had a clear choice:

A) leave M2M as-is, and allow all these securities to be valued at "???" (which essentially means ZERO) then act as if the sky was falling, scream bloody murder, "too big to fail", etc, and get a huge chunk of free taxpayer money AND have the government take the worst assets off your books. Gratis.

-or-

B) let M2M be amended to something more sane, allow the assets to be properly valued, but lose anywhere from 20-50% because you made bad business decisions.

Hmmm... I know which one I'd choose.

No comments:

EDITORIALS: Sad Hill News

EDITORIALS: American Issues Project

EDITORIALS: American Thinker

EDITORIALS: Conservative Dialysis

EDITORIALS: Defund & Disobey

EDITORIALS: DickMorris.com

EDITORIALS: Firm Foundation

EDITORIALS: Investor's Business Daily - Editorial RSS

EDITORIALS: John Goodman's Health Policy Blog

EDITORIALS: Obama Lies

EDITORIALS: Onenewsnow.com Front Page Stories

EDITORIALS: Power Line

EDITORIALS: RedState

EDITORIALS: Sharp Right Turn

EDITORIALS: The Cloakroom Blog

EDITORIALS: The Front Page

EDITORIALS: The Next Right

EDITORIALS: The Patriot Room

EDITORIALS: TownHall Latest columns

EDITORIALS: Vocal Minority

EDITORIALS: Webloggin

ECONOMICS: Agora Financial's The 5 Min. Forecast

ECONOMICS: Capital Commerce

ECONOMICS: Capitalism Magazine (CapMag.com)

ECONOMICS: CARPE DIEM

ECONOMICS: NCPA | Daily Policy Digest

ECONOMICS: RealClearMarkets

ECONOMICS: WSJ.com: Real Time Economics

NEWS: NewsBusters.org - Exposing Liberal Media Bias

NEWS: Newsmax - Inside Cover

NEWS: Resistnet.com

NEWS (SATIRE): ONN Front Page Stories

TRACKING: The Obameter: Tracking Obama's Campaign Promises